In the second last chapter of "A New Kind of Christian" Brian Mclaren gives a take on human history that is nothing short of brilliant. I find it very helpful. He describes human history as having different zones to which he assigns a specific colour (for a specific reason that will become clear later). Each zone is defined by a specific quest or struggle...
The first identifiable zone in human history was a quest for survival. As hunter-gatherers human beings were involved in a desperate struggle for the basic life sustaining properties such as food and water. During this stage God was came to think of as the Provider (and at times the "Withhelder") of things necessary for survival. Brian identifies this stage with the colour red.
This zone was followed by a Quest for Security. As people came to live together in clans and tribes they felt the need to secure their land and sources form other tribes. During this stage a theology developed in which God was seen as the Almighty Warrior and protector. This Brian calls the orange zone
Third the quest for power came for as competing city states began to be ruled by powerful warlords, a need developed to have a competitive advantage over others. Many people indeed found this competitive advantage over others in a believe in God as a all powerful king, emperor or even dictator depending on the form of governance the people got used to. This is the yellow zone.
Fourth the quest that followed was one for independence. As people became aware of the fact that the more powerful a ruler became the more corrupt he becomes a need developed to have something even better than human rulers and in their mind that turned out to be timeless laws, principles and values to which even the rulers must adhere. Now God became less the King and more of the Judge and in many peoples minds only the distant architect of timeless laws and principles who actually isn't involved in any relational way in His creation. The age of rationality has dawned. Brian calls this the green zone.
Next came the quest for individuality as a natural consequence. Since the world was now seen as a rational machine which operated according to set universal laws people felt free to explore their individuality through competition for goods. Independence was what all strive for (many still does of course). God now became our Personal Saviour which was understood as the one who's blessing could be gained for personal success and individual achievement. People formed voluntary denominations and associations which could be joined according to personal choice hence the religious "industry". This was the blue zone.
The next zone was one of disillusionment. We looked back at things such as two world wars, the Khmer Rough regime in Cambodia, Apartheid in South Africa. We realised that we are destroying the planet by running after profit on profit. We looked the fact in the eye that we made a few people rich and the great many others dirt-poor. We began asking ourselves if the rational we worshiped weren't perhaps overrated. We don't exactly know what to do about the mess we created but we want to start by at least not denying the dilemmas we created. This the quest in this, the indigo zone can be described as a quest for honesty. Some like to call this quest for honesty relativism, pluralism or post modernism.
The next quest would be a quest for Peace and healing in which we not only deconstruct but also start building anew in a spirit of togetherness that African philosophy coined as "Ubuntu". Here the community and relational qualities of God are (re)discovered. Brian Calls this the violet zone.
How coming zones and quests are going to look like we can only speculate. The kicker is that we are not all in the same history zone. When you look at the theologies of different churches you'll notice some still in the quest for protection, others involved in the quest for security, individualism and power. Those stuck in earlier stages tend to either shy away from or worst, attack the truths later stages wants to add to our understanding of God. Those in more advanced stages tend to look down upon earlier stages thinking about the people comfortable there as obstructionists. When they (we) do this they objectify and dehumanise the honest effort of people in previous and future zones which of course helps nobody. It is the violet zone's insights that might show us a better way to look at each other. It is therefore good to realise that all colours put together gives us in a metaphorical sense, the light of God. Therefore listening and appreciating one anther's insights as coming from an honest struggle of wrestling with what it means to be human and what it means to believe in God. We must try and give a person in a different zone than us the space to explore and share whether it be from a zone before or after our own.
What excites me about the person of Jesus when I consider Brian's take on history is that He is not just another child of His time but the Child born into the fullness of time, not only one representing a colour but the one who gave us a glimpse of the true light of God that we will one day experience when all history's zones has played out. Therefore looking unto Him can enable us to transcends the zones and thinking we are stuck in and continue growing in our exiting journey of discovering God, a journey we somehow blandly describe as history.